Using the Dibels System on the palm pilot was very interesting and at the same time frustrating to use. Because the device was unfamiliar to me, I found it confusing at first. When I finally understood how to use it, I realized how much time it would save me as a teacher. With a touch of a screen, I can access many different evaluation materials that can be administered and assessed quickly. Data can be stored and charted to evaluate student progress in minutes. This eliminates all paper work that can be cumbersome and inconvenient to keep.
When comparing the QRI-5 to Dibels, the most obvious difference is the grade levels each system targets. The QRI-5 provides assessment materials for students in grades K-12, while Dibels targets students from K-6. Dibels also has stringent rules on timing for each assessment; one minute. The goal of this timed assessment is to achieve automaticity and fluency in early literacy skills critical for reading comprehension. The QRI-5 also has timed assessments but it is not used on all grade levels.
The QRI-5 and Dibels both offer a number of investigating options that serve a collection of choices. They can be used to identify reading levels and match students to suitable text, verify a suspected reading problem, determine strength and needs of a student, and recommend paths for interventions. Even though the QRI-5 and Dibels are designed to identify students having difficulty in achieving basic literacy skills, Dibels assesses more in-depth issues pertaining to phonemic awareness, alphabetic principle, accuracy and fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. The measures that encompass Dibels are Initial Sounds Fluency (ISF), Letter Naming Fluency (LNF), Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF), Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF), Oral Reading Fluency (ORF), Retell Fluency (RTF), and Word Use Fluency (WUF). The QRI-5 encompasses word lists, concept questions (accessing prior knowledge), miscue analysis, retelling, and comprehension questions. Although examiners using the QRI-5 will notice phonemic awareness when a student reads the word list, there is not a specific evaluation for that concept.
It is my opinion that Dibels’ assessments are broader in terms of evaluating student difficulties with basic early literacy skills.